Are you in High School, College, Masters, Bachelors or Ph.D and need someone to help write your essay or research? We offer premium quality essay writing help. All our papers are original, 0% plagiarized & uniquely written by our dedicated Masters specialists. My Essay Services is an experienced service with over 9 years experience in research writing of over 97,000 essays over the years. You will receive a plagiarism check certificate that confirms originality for any essay you order with My Essay Services. Fill the calculator on your right to begin placing your order now!

Sample Essay On Human Rights Campaign

Human Rights Campaign, has used rhetorical strategies to create a rapport with the audience and help the story to move forward in a progressive and orderly fashion. The use of inductive reasoning in writing is key in applying logic and reason to the story. The writer begins by providing the reader with a sufficient amount of facts that support his conclusion. The proof that it is time for the Supreme Court to resolve the issue of national marriage equality is well stated at the beginning of the article.

“The People’s Brief "is a campaign that has collected a total of 207,551 signatories of Americans of all 50 elements, as well as Puerto Rico, American Samoa, and the U.S. Virgin Islands. These signatories include LGBT citizens, family members and friends of LGBT individuals and other fair-minded Americans that believe in marriage equality for all in America regardless of sexual orientation. The number of signatures has been given to show the significance of the campaign for marriage equality. Inductive reasoning helps the audience to agree with the author because the amount of evidence provided is adequate.

Ethos or the ethical claim is based on the reputation, credibility or reliability of the writer. The Human Rights Campaign writer gains credibility because of the Human Rights Campaign (HRC) is the largest LGBT civil rights advocacy group that lobby the federal government, educating the public and participating in elections. Therefore, the information presented in the article posts are deemed credible and reliable by the readers. The author of the article has organized the article in a logical, easy to follow manner to lead the scholar to a certain summing-up. A common ground was established between the writer and the audience by acknowledging that a large number of Americans believe in marriage equality, and all have a goal of aligning the US Constitution to follow their values.

Pathos or emotional appeal to the audience's needs, values, and emotional sensibilities has been properly used to persuade the reader into having an emotional attachment to the story. "The People's Brief" has been presented as a legitimate and moving campaign with a genuine interest in the marriage equality for all Americans. The emotion behind the campaign is used to supports the claim that marriage equality debate is important and represents the feelings of Americans.

Limit Abortion Rights Sample Essay & Outline

The article covers the state instigated elections to criminalize or limit abortion rights. The moves in Colorado, Tennessee and North Dakota are fresh attempts by the state assembly to revive the ethical debate surrounding abortion. Colorado aims at introducing new definitions of personhood in Amendment 67 (Editoral Board, 2014). The proposed amendments are the modifications of the previously rejected amendments in 2008 and 2010. The proposed amendments specifically aim at conferring rights on fertilized eggs and unborn fetus similar to the one conferred upon living human beings. The legislation mundanely seeks to criminalize abortion even when the pregnancy was gotten through incest or rape.

Miscarriages will be cited to be instances of abortion and not health issues (Editoral Board, 2014). The doctors will be subjected to intense scrutiny for foul play in the abortion debate (Editoral Board, 2014). North Dakota aims at adding restrictive language to the constitution with the final effect being limitation of abortion rights. In Tennessee, the debate surrounds the rights that the amendment will confer to the legislature such that it will decide when and what obstacles to abortion will be implemented. The new amendments will increase the extent and magnitude of the restrictions.

The reader will ask himself questions such as; what are the grounds for a legal abortion? This question will emanate from the fact that the legislations aim at limiting the power of the people to choose. The second question that the reader will ask himself or herself is; how superior are the state enacted legislations to the national constitution. The third question will be what have the legislators done differently that makes them confident that their legislations will pass even after meeting defeated overwhelmingly in the past attempts? The final question that most people will ask themselves is what contributions will the legislations have on the general well being of the expectant women?

Reference

Editoral Board,. (2014). Reproductive Rights on the Ballot. Nytimes.com. Retrieved 30 November 2014, from http://www.nytimes.com/2014/10/14/opinion/reproductive-rights-on-the-bal...