Are you in High School, College, Masters, Bachelors or Ph.D and need someone to help in your homework? All you need is to ask for research paper help written by a specialist in your academic field. When you buy an essay online from My Essay Services, we offer you an original, nil plagiarized and unique paper written by a dedicated writer who is PhD or Masters qualified. MyEssayServices.com is an experienced service with over 9 years experience having delivered over 83,000 essays over the years.

Employee On-boarding Sample Essay & Outline

Employee onboarding is alternatively referred to as organizational socialization. Employee onboarding is process used in the inclusion of new employees in the organization by increasing their socialization with the rest of the members of the organization (Bradt & Vonnegut, 2009). Employee onboarding includes the induction of the new employees into the organization by exposing them to the organizational culture and familiarization with the processes. The process of organizational socialization leads to the conversion of the employees from outsiders into parts of the organization the process entails the impartation of the knowledge, behaviors and skills that would make it easier for the employees to configure their lives to the prevalent organizational culture.

Techniques of employee on boarding include the use of formal meetings whereby the employees are taught about the organization and its culture. The formal induction meeting can also be conducted via digital means such as the use of emails (Bradt & Vonnegut, 2009). The organization sends the message of inclusion once it embarks on the employee on boarding.

The main benefit of the approach is the increased performance of the members of the organization. The newcomers have the ability to develop competencies in terms of the performance. There are also easier induction and transition for the employees that have progressed from the lower cadres to higher levels of the hierarchy. The process of employee on boarding leads to the development of higher levels of jobs satisfaction with the employees more aware of the requirements of the jobs and means of attaining them.

The employees also indicate higher levels of organizational commitment. The employees feel that they are appreciated by the system. Therefore, they will be more willing to work towards the attainment of the organizational goals (Bradt & Vonnegut, 2009). The employees that have undergone the process of employee onboarding have reduced occupations stress since they are aware of how to handle themselves in the organizational. They can also avoid instances of pariah feeling since the employees have already been included in the organization.

Employee onboarding in the organization entails the use of socialization tactics. The socialization or orientation tactics are designed to provide the most optimal means of attaining organizational goals. The organization uses collective socialization (Bradt & Vonnegut, 2009). This was a mandatory orientation whereby the new batch of employees were undertaken through the orientation process (Roebuck, 2012). The group orientation is more desirable when inducting the employees that have been hired as a group because of graduate recruitment programs.

The socialization process also assumed a formal approach. In this approach, the new inductees are separated from the rest of the employees and sent to training programs (Sims, 2011). The formal separation enabled the delivery of new skills that will be more relevant to the entrants as opposed to the more seasoned employee (Roebuck, 2012) s. However, there were instances of informal socialization whereby the organization allowed the new recruits to learn about the organization from the more seasoned members. The informal approach allowed the employees to make observations and draw insights from what they observed.

The organization used serial socialization that allowed the employees to groom the newcomers that were meant to occupy some positions in the organization. The approach was mainly used in the development of the successors of retiring or transferring professionals on the top level of the organization (Bradt & Vonnegut, 2009). The serial on boarding approach was effective in the development of the mentor ship relations and hands on skills on how to react in given situational

The reliance on the formal on boarding by the company did not work out to the eventual gain of the company since the employees still felt that they were in an external environment. In the minds of the new employees, they felt that they were being secluded from the rest due to their newcomer status (Roebuck, 2012). Therefore, it ended up creating feelings of non-inclusion hence aggravating the pariah status perception by the employees.

The use of the serial socialization was an effective approach given that the majority of the entrants in the top position need direction that can only be offered by the outgoing members. Induction of the top officials using serial socialization led to the development of the capacity of the new members to continue with the projects and approaches of the predecessor (Sims, 2011). Even if the new employee would change the approaches, there is a likelihood of staying in the direction of the predecessor (Bradt & Vonnegut, 2009). Therefore, the organization would be able to avoid the instances of misdirection and the arbitrary changes on the approaches that is witnessed with the change of leadership.

The practice of rotating the employees on a normal basis was also viable with the members that were rotated being more useful to the organization (Bradt & Vonnegut, 2009). The rotation allowed the employees to understand the different processes used by the organization. Therefore, the members could understand the organization form a holistic view.

In conclusion, the employee on boarding is an integral process in the development of the capacity of the employees (Roebuck, 2012). The employees have better performance once they are inducted in the organization and are aware of the processes that the organization adheres to.

References

Bradt, G., & Vonnegut, M. (2009). Onboarding. Hoboken, N.J.: Wiley.
Roebuck, K. (2012). Onboarding. [Newstead, Australia?: Emereo Pub.?.
Sims, D. (2011). Creative onboarding programs. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Changes in the Job Sector Sample Essay & Outline

There are several changes that have occurred in the job sector. They have generally changed the landscape of the job industry and consequently it is important to understand their nature. The first is the introduction of technology. Technology is rapidly changing and there is a need for the market to be constantly updated regarding the new changes. Companies have to occasionally change their technology to the latest if they want to remain active and have optimum production capabilities. This further means that more workers need to be trained in order to use the new equipment. Another issue that has affected the job landscape is the introduction of new laws and regulations. Again, these are not constant and consequently they keep on changing and there is a need for the companies and their employees to ensure that understand the laws and regulations to be on the safe side of the law.

These changes demand new research. For example, as a personnel consultant it is important to understand that each and every time there is new technology; one does the relevant research regarding it and finds its use and whether it can work optimally in a certain organization. This is also the same case when it comes to laws and regulations, it is important to ensure that there is adequate research into this field.
These changes have impacted me personally as a personnel consultant because I have to be always updated regarding technology and this means going to great lengths to research about technology, how it is used, and the training that should be given to the employers in order for them to understand how to use the said machinery.

References

W. L., Bell, C. H., & Zawacki, R. A. (2012). Organization development and transformation: Managing effective change (6th ed.). New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J. & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind (3rd ed.). New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Marquardt, M. J., & Horvath, L. (2012). Global teams: How top multinationals span boundaries and cultures with high-speed teamwork. (Laureate Education, Inc., custom ed.) Palo Alto, CA: Davies-Black Publishing.

Job Specialization and Organizational Performance Sample Essay & Outline

Every company has a unique channel of power or protocol. There are individuals who perform management tasks, supervision while others are subordinate workers. In order to maximally utilize the expertise of their employees, business organizations use job and division and specialization to allocate tasks. Job division refers to the act of allocation each individual in an organization a task as opposed to allocating the task to a group or department. On the other hand, job, specialization refers to the principle of allocating employees the tasks that they perform best. Mostly job specialization is attached to the area of expertise that an employee’s majors on (Bauer & Erdogan, 2011). The following paper seeks to explore the influence of job specialization on the performance of the business.

There is nothing that demoralizes employees than assigning them tasks that are outside their area of expertise. Most people perform best when they are assigned tasks in which they can handle adequately. When a task requires less expertise than an employee possesses, the employee is likely to underrate the task and become relaxant. On the other hand, tasks that are beyond the employee’s capability over works the employee. These two conditions lead to low performance.

Job specialization is a vital tool in increasing performance. Allocating employees the tasks that they have great specialty in motivates them to produce the best output. A researcher by the name Fredrick Taylor was among the first people to research on job design. In his finding he realized that job specialization enabled him to work with fewer employees (Bauer & Erdogan, 2011). The explanation behind this finding is that the employees are more committed when allocated tasks on their own other than they work in groups. Employees also become more productive which results in higher performance for the whole business.

References
Bauer, T. & Erdogan, B. (2011). Motivating employees through job design.