Death Penalty Free Essay Samples & Outline
Are you in High School, College, Masters, Bachelors or Ph.D and need someone to help in your homework? We offer quality research writing help, All our papers are original, 0% plagiarized & uniquely written by our dedicated Masters specialists. My Essay Services is an experienced service with over 9 years experience in research writing and over 83,000 essays over the years. You will receive a plagiarism check certificate that confirms originality for any essay you order with My Essay Services
Sample Essay On "For the Death Penalty"
The death penalty is also a death sentence, capital punishment or execution. This is a legal process where the state puts an individual to death as punishment for a crime. The crimes resulting in the death sentence are capital offenses or capital crimes including aggravated murder, drug trafficking and crimes related to homicide (Moore 17).
Most societies have been practicing death penalty in the past, but most have abolished the practice due to controversies fueled by religions, political ideologies and laws concerning the protection of human rights. The societies that still apply the death penalty to date are China, the United States, India and Indonesia. In the past, the execution has been through beheading while lethal injection is increasingly preferable in recent decades. This paper is going to argue the grounds on why the death penalty should be practiced.
Death penalty is an issue that a number of people found controversy and have differing opinions. There is the person that firmly support the death penalty especially the victims of violent crimes whereas another feel that the government should abolish it (Moore 18). On the other hand, there is a club of individuals that feel the death penalty should be applied in only specific cases. I am such a person, and am of the opinion that the death penalty should only be incorporated in the case of an unforgivable crime such as serial murderers, rapists, and coldly premeditated murder. However, there is a need to be aware that crime is evident in the society we live in, and everyone is aware that it should be stopped at whatever cost and that not every crime should be punished by the death penalty (Radelet 19). The death penalty has been there since the Babylonian times, and most countries have adopted it, abolished and others have decided to apply it in specific instances.
Those supporting the idea of the death penalty argue that it is aimed at deterring future criminals who might be thinking of committing monstrous crimes. The deterrence is important in the society as a person will think twice before he or she commits premeditated murder (Moore 22). The person will undoubtedly know and understand the consequences that await him or her. Therefore, the probability of such a person will commit the crime decreases as they understand the harsh consequences they face when they commit a crime.
It is of the essence to concede that while attorneys protect the rights of the murderer, the victim’s family is in many cases forgotten. All the family gets is sympathy from the media and pretend politicians. In most cases, the victim’s family receives inadequate compensation for the loss. However, through the death penalty, the family is assured the murderer will never commit a crime again (Moore 45). They receive the justice that they deserve.
Therefore, those in support of capital punishment feel, it should always be there and be effective. In many cases, death penalties turn to be a life sentence or the criminals are condemned to die in death row rather than by execution. The effectiveness of the death penalty relies on the willingness of government officials who are in charge of it to use liberty. If exercised, the penalty is likely to stop criminals from committing a monstrous crime thus restoring justice.
If the penalty were used frequently then, people would avoid violent crimes. Monstrous criminals would think before committing a crime that is consequences are death (Moore 65). Because of this penalty the society would gain security. An illustration is in the Roman Empire where death penalty was effective and efficient than spending the tax payer’s money in maintaining the criminals in prison cells. People capable of brutality should be prevented from repeating the same crime and act as a lesson to those intending to do so. Therefore, the death penalty is the best way to go in the protection of the society.
For one to be sentenced to the death penalty then, they must have committed a crime in a clear state of mind. The full process of the law should take place, and there is a need for a full investigation in order to ensure that an innocent man is not sent to death (Moore 43). The law should take its full course, and the courts should ensure that indeed they look at all the possible perspectives in the case before capital punishment can be handed out.
There are those that are against capital punishment, and they have different reasons for supporting the abolishing of the death penalty. They first argue that death penalty executions require extremely high costs. Estimates show that it is more costly to execute people than sentence them to life imprisonment. The states impose heavy taxes to their citizens in order to maintain the capital punishment system (Radelet 18). They argue that it is so expensive because death row inmates require exceptional cells, unique dining arrangements, exercising, medical care and distinctive guards.
The legal costs are the greatest where the government must pay attorneys to prosecute the appeal cases for the death row inmates. However, should the society put a cost on the life of an innocent girl in the streets? If these criminals are not removed from the streets, they might be the ones to defile a young girl or commit premeditated murder on the bread-winner of the family (Radelet 22). For this purpose, there is a need to teach these criminals a lesson in a bid to deter crime in the society. In fact, no price should be given to securing the nation. The government spends billions in military equipment that is obsolete in a few years (Radelet 94). Therefore, it should not put any restrictions when it comes to the protecting of its citizens by eliminating elements that are hell-bent on destroying them.
Those in favor of abolition argue that costs are not the only issue to contend with in the debate over the death penalty. Innocence has been an equally thorny issue. There have been executions of innocent people where the governments are unable to prevent such accidental executions. Wrongful execution is injustice towards the people and cannot be reversed. A person can face the death sentence when innocent of any crime. There have been people released from the death row minutes before their execution.
However, as explained earlier, this is extremely hard in this age of technology (Peterson 73). There is the use of DNA and other reliable methods that indeed show the criminal. Therefore, this issue can be described as a non-issue as the numbers in the Criminal Justice department are negligible to aid this argument (Peterson 37).
In the United States, majority like the death sentence, and often appears to be reasonably contented with the executions as seen in most surveys. For example in a poll carried out in 2008, 63% believed in capital punishment. However, those arguing against it looks at the ethical issues involved, the theoretical factor of the death punishment concerns whether criminal execution is ever a form of punishment that is morally defensible (Fridell 32).
They argue that death punishment is never ethically reasonable and, therefore, it should be illegal. One of the reasons they give is that death punishment is not morally justifiable because it is forced subjectively, as per the attitude of the judge, the prosecutor and the juror, and a person’s capability to meet the expense of a proper defense. However, hard evidence is hard evidence, whether it is published to a Harvard lawyer or a high school dropout.
The other argument against the death penalty is discrimination. Statistics shows that about eighty percent of all murder victims are said to be blacks while fifteen percent are said to be white. Those that do not back the death penalty, such as NAACP argue that the system favors the white as compared to the black. However, this is not a legitimate argument as it has been seen that if one commits a crime that deserves a death sentence, then the death sentence should be handed to him or her regardless of the race that they come from. Therefore, the death penalty should not be biased on race and should not go against cruel and unusual punishment clause.
Death penalty ensures safety of the society, and if that is the case then, the society does not need to complain of the expenses that come with it (Fridell 54). Human lives in the society including those of innocent children and hardworking fathers and mothers are important and should be protected from the serial killers, rapists and drug dealers that are determined to ruin the society, commit murder and rape women and small children. The death penalty should, therefore, be handed to the persons that deserve it.
In resolution, the death penalty is one of the major issues that different people have a different opinion about. There are some who favor it while others are against the idea of killing a criminal even if the person is guilty. Death penalty deters criminals from committing heinous crimes; it scares them as they know what they will face when they commit the crimes. Further, it eliminates the bad apples in the society that can cause rot to the whole society.
These people if allowed to live can commit more crimes in the prisons (Fridell 84). Further, there are those crimes such as premeditated cold murder that can only be punished by a death sentence. Any less than that will be an injustice to the victim as well as the loved ones of the family that the victim belonged to. Those against the death penalty argue that innocent people might die, however, this is a rare occurrence. They also play the human right card and cost. However, it is also not in the human rights to coldly take away the life of a person and the government has a role and duty to shield its citizens from this bad apples and elements in the society. In regards to cost, there is no price that can be put on the peace and tranquility of the citizens.
Fridell, R. Capital punishment. New York: Benchmark Books. 2004. Print
Moore, B. N. Making your case: Critical thinking and the argumentative essay. Mountain View, Calif: Mayfield Pub. Co. 1995. Print.
Radelet, M. L. Facing the death penalty: Essays on a cruel and unusual punishment. Philadelphia: Temple University Press. 1989. Print.
Peterson, Tim. The death sentence: why it is important: The University of Kentucky Press. 2014. Print