Law Enforcements Essay Examples & Outline
Are you in High School, College, Masters, Bachelors or Ph.D and need assistance with your research paper? All you need is to ask for research paper help written by a specialist in your academic field. When you buy an essay from us, we offer you an original, nil plagiarized and unique paper written by a dedicated writer who is PhD or Masters qualified. MyEssayservices.com is an experienced service with over 9 years experience having delivered over 83,000 essays over the years.
Law enforcement, parole and probation agencies help in striking a balance in security within the community. Given their similarities, they have true partnerships in existence (Hess & Orthmann, 2009). Despite their roles being similar, there are exists indifferences among them. The main cause of these indifferences is that police spend much of their time in arresting people from the streets while, in the same context, the probation and parole officers spend their time keeping these offenders integrated within the community. The indifference is not the main concern in the paper but rather pointing out the factor that may lead to poor law enforcement. Superficially, this appears as a diametric opposed position.
Neither of the two groups can ignore the fact that most adult offenders had been in prison. The law enforcement agencies may have the power of determining the people they arrest while the probation officers have no power over the people they receive from the corrective centers. It is ultimate that the law enforcement and parole or probation officers have the role of preventing the commission of new crimes. Congruent challenges in law enforcement cannot be achieved through either of the officers in isolation. Community policing is one way that that may help in linking the probation and law enforcement policies together (Hess & Orthmann, 2009).
This collaboration helps in addressing the immediate conditions that will help in ensuring public safety. The ongoing presence of the offenders in the community begs the need of effective partnership to reduce recurrence of crime. For this partnership to be enhanced, various considerations need to be addressed. The first step is understanding the role-played by each of the group (Hess & Orthmann, 2009). Each agency for instance needs to guard against crossing to the other line of duty. This entails taking up the duty of other officers. Challenges in effective partnership entail jurisdictional boundaries. City police, for instance, may be the one that has the jurisdiction in maintaining law and order as well as taking the probation and parole role of the agency. There are many other issues with certainty that need address. Maintaining individual and organizational relationship will help in achieving the partnerships. This paper is about law enforcement and the relationship between the officers and probation/parole officers in maintaining peace and tranquility within the community. This paper will also talk about a selected crime being rising cases of burglary.
A major shift in law enforcement from a reactive or incident policing to a proactive crime prevention and control. There is a shift towards problem-oriented policing (Peak & Glensor, 2012). Problem orientation helps in defining new approaches such as the use of intensive police research and crime analysis to identify the criminal activities and patterns within the society. Information collected by law enforcement agents help in defining the scope and nature of certain crimes and crime-related problems (Peak & Glensor, 2012). Crime analysis involves the use of GIS for mapping hence achieve problem solving processes. Law enforcement will help in solving the rising cases of crimes and ensuring a collaborative effort between the probation officers and the police. Persistent findings indicate that a small number of individuals continuously contribute to a number of arrests.
Good law enforcement will help in monitoring the locations of such probationers. Information sharing is of the essence, and this means the police can access the probation database. From the database, it is possible to obtain the personal information of these offenders. On the other hand, the probation officers would obtain police data that will help them monitor offenders and reduce the risk of re-offense. Enhancement in this category can happen through access of geo-coded police data. This data regard the arrests and interrogation performed and could help in alerting the probation officer on the whereabouts of these offenders (Peak & Glensor, 2012). The information will help to counter the emotionally and volatile probationers or their family members. Such information will ensure the safety on their occupation.
Petty crimes may have profound effects on the economy of the region and the victim. Such crimes, for example, burglary, go unnoticed and ignored. Integration of data and sharing of information between the two groups of officers will help in reducing such incidences (Peak & Glensor, 2012). Law enforcement officer contributes much to the criminal justice system through conviction of the offender arrested. In the same context of parole/probation supervision plays a critical role. In some situations, the offender placed on parole may also be an absconder of the probation. Parole officers, as already mentioned, have no arrest authority, and they depend on the law enforcement agencies for arresting parole violators. The indication in this case is the co-operation between the parole officers and the law enforcement officers.
Law enforcement and parole/probation agencies have a common denominator which entails solving and reducing crime. The only difference between them is the perspective and approach. Joining of forces will ensure a leverage and sharing of resources for their mutual benefits. The most compromising situation is that the partnership has an ad hoc nature without a full blend in the core work of corrections. There are significant data showing the relationship between law enforcement and parole officers will help in achieving positive outcomes. Partnerships need to be institutionalized as portfolios in the agencies. Law enforcement led information sharing forms a valuable asset in the fight against crime. The aim in this aspect is weave the information seamlessly in the operations (Joan Petersilia, 2009). Another aspect is data management in partnership. This entail the creation of the database that is cross-sectional between the probation and law enforcement agencies.
Probation and parole officers have become actively involved in the response to the rising cases of burglary. It has been noted through various analytical processes that probation officers act as the external conscience to these offenders. The meaning of this term is that probation officers will make sure that the offenders of this crime abide by the stipulations in their parole. In a bid to prevent the rising cases of burglary, the officers are encouraged to participate in groups meant at preventing these crimes. Volunteer to share the information to the law agencies with the notification of violators of parole. Such information sharing will assist in apprehending such offenders.
They should also use their experience in the control of rising cases of burglary (Hess & Orthmann, 2009). In this move, the officers should understand the background of the perpetrators and share any wayward behaviors with the parents (Peak & Glensor, 2012). These officers have the important roles in preventing the rising burglary issues. They do not have a restrictive role in supervising offenders, but performing certain activities that will help the probationers fit in the society. Law enforcement officials are the first to respond to crime scenes and follow the due course of the law to ensure prevailing of justice.
Law enforcement officers help in the conceptualization of mainstream correction strategies. Increased instances of burglary fall in the category of crime and the police help in the implementation of legal procedures that involve apprehending the culprits (Peak & Glensor, 2012). Through forging the necessary collaborative partnerships, strategic crime control can be achieved. In the crime scene such as incidence of burglary, the police are the first respondents often leading in the process of investigation and issue warrants of arrests to the culprits.
Culprits who continuously commit these crimes may be under placed under probation by the magistrate or the judge. Local parole officers come handy when there is a violation of the probation. Since they have no authority of issuing warrants of arrests or even apprehending the suspects, these violations are reported to the Parole Department (Hess & Orthmann, 2009). The department actively review the report, and if there is an establishment of the violations, a warrant of arrest is issued. The Parole department is involved in issuing a warrant of arrest. In conjunction with the law enforcement agencies, Parole violator is apprehended.
The legal process follows. In the process, the court establishes preliminary hearing to the case. The violator is placed in custody while waiting the revocation hearing. In the revocation hearing, lack of enough evidence leads to the release of the violator. In situations when there is enough evidence, the prisoner is ordered and returned to the Parole Department. Through the interaction between the law enforcement officers and the Parole department, crime rates decreased considerably especially burglary-related crimes (Hess & Orthmann, 2009). Strengthening and ensuring positive relationship between the police department and the parole department help in solving the reducing the crime cases (Peak & Glensor, 2012).
Police officers and parole officers need to remain receptive to the program and offer the necessary assistance. Police-parole officer’s partnerships help to establish both formal and informal agreements between the police departments. This help in deterring commission of crimes for both the juveniles and adults offenders (Joan Petersilia, 2009). Probations and parole fall under the category of community agencies. The partnership between these departments will go a long way in solving serious to petty crimes. Burglary as a crime remains the top agenda in many neighborhoods and may go unnoticed. Complexity of criminal activities brings a vicious cycle which never ends, therefore, there is high tendency that these crimes may recur. Police-parole partnership helps in solving the crimes thus deterring their recurrence.
The accrued benefits arising from such partnerships include enhanced partnerships. The activities help in supervisions of the high-risk probationers or parolees. The enhanced supervision helps in deterring offenders from committing more crimes. They help in apprehending fugitives who abscond the conditions of release (Hess & Orthmann, 2009). Partnership between the parole and the law enforcement officers helps in sharing vital information that may lead to knowing the location of the offenders and thus, leading to the apprehension. About other enforcement agencies, partnerships help in the joint address of criminal activities such as drugs and gang activities.
The correlations between the parole or probation officers and the intersection with the law enforcement agencies help in controlling the crime rates (Hess & Orthmann, 2009). Crime reduction should be the main agenda in partnership. Crimes such as burglary are only solved through better relationships between the two departments. Statistics shows that most offenders are convicted and serve their sentences within the community. Co-operation between the parole officers and the law enforcement officials will help in controlling recurrences of crimes by these offenders.
Hess, K. M., & Orthmann, C. M. (2009). Introduction to law enforcement and criminal justice. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.
Joan Petersilia (2009). When Prisoners Come Home: Parole and Prisoner Reentry. Oxford University Press, USA.
Peak, K. J., & Glensor, R. W. (2012). Community policing and problem solving: Strategies and practices. Boston: Pearson.