Coca Cola Cultural Dimension Essay Examples & Outline
Are you in High School, College, Masters, Bachelors or Ph.D and need assistance with your research paper? All you need is to ask for essay help written by a specialist in your academic field. When you buy an essay from us, we offer you an original, nil plagiarized and unique paper written by a dedicated writer who is PhD or Masters qualified. MyEssayServices.com is an experienced service with over 9 years experience having delivered over 83,000 essays over the years.
Cultural dimensions in Coca-Cola Company
The organisation’s culture and the national culture of the area where a company operates have the capacity to influence the success of the company. Success of a company or even an individual depends on the culture that the organisation assumes. The culture of any organisation is made up of the norms and the values that the organisation holds. In most of the cases, a culture is mainly but from the many years of experience or as a result of the repetitive action by the members.
The organisations that have sound cultural practices have the potential of attaining high levels of performance. Therefore, in order for any organisation to develop and attain the desired level of competitiveness, the organisational structure has to consider the impact of the internal and external cultural influences on the practices and performance of the organisation. The paper will focus on Coca-Cola Company since it has operations in virtually all the areas in the world. The paper will analyse the organisational structure adopted by Coca Cola Company in terms of its adherence to the tenets proposed by Hofstede and how far the organisational structure of the organisation is effective in the attainment of the organisational goals. The paper will also look into the possible areas of improvement that are required of the organisation.
Coca-Cola is a beverage making company that has a global presence. It also acts as a marketer and distributor of the non-alcoholic drinks in its brand array. The company is popular for the flagship product Coca-Cola. The organisation of Coca-Cola is peculiar in that Asa Candler builds its success on the franchises that it has been operating since the incorporation of the company. The company has a major presence in the global market whereby it operates in 200 countries selling over 400 brands. In the franchises system, the company only produces the concentrate syrup that is then sold to the bottlers of the company that are spread all over the countries where it has operations Hofstede, 2001).
The main secret behind the success of the company on the global arena comes from its commitment to work according to the tastes and beliefs of the people that are around it. This is espoused in its mission whereby it acknowledge that the world is dynamic and the best way of acquiring the necessary competitive levels is by creation of the correct understanding of the forces that are in play and moving to prepare itself. The company has organised itself based on two aspects; that is, the knowledge that it has about current trends and the anticipated knowledge of the company concerning the most likely outcomes in the future.
The company organizes its sector alongside the tenets of diversity such that it will accommodate all the people in all that it does. It has been particularly keen to provide for the diversity of the human beings. The company also works hard towards ensuring that all the people work towards a common goal. The company has of recently organized its activities towards the visions 2020. According to this vision, the company ought to be better than it is now. The organisation structure of the company in the headquarters is directed towards the attainment of the same goal. The bottlers are seen as the partners for the company since they deal with the distribution of the main product that the consumer takes Hofstede, 2002).
The company would be ill equipped to handle the diversity of the people if it was to operate as a global business empire that takes care of all the activities. This means that the company does not have the potential of handling the issues that are pertinent unless it includes the distributors since they have the real information on the operations of the company. The organization structure that it has adopted has had a significant influence on the mode of operation of the company (Dartey-Baah, 2013). The same organisation structure has been the main source of the competitiveness in the market that has enabled the company to stand out among the peers. The other companies have tried a management system that seeks to control he activities of the bottlers or to involve themselves in the activities undertaken by the bottlers but have ended up failing.
This means that the success elements that have affected the company on a large scale have been due to the original organisation of the company and the relations that it has created with the other players in the market. The mere appreciation of the outside suppliers as the main members in the success of the company have led to the development of a culture that seeks to involve itself with the affairs of the other players in the supply chain while reducing the common approach of the management adopted by the other players in the non-alcoholic beverage industry. The view of the members of the supply chain that are in the bottom of the supply chain has led to the creation of competitiveness of the company as a whole (Dartey-Baah, 2013).
The approaches used in the management of the human resources and the general organisation of the company have sought to include the perspectives and needs of the rest of the players in the supply chain. The company has been able to organise its operations in accordance to the expectations of the people (Hofstede, 2011). The organisational culture of the company may draw a lot from the west but the company has operations in all the areas of the world. The imposition of the culture that the company upholds in the headquarters to all the people will be uncalled for since the people that the company deals with are from the diverse regions of the world and they have different individual and national cultural organisation. The company tries to avoid the situation that was described by Hofstede as the uncertainty avoidance.
The impositions of the cultural orientations of the company that is used in Atlanta will be a sure recipe for uncertainty. The company has advanced this approach to all that it does even in the advertising such that it has the relevance to all the cultural groups that it sells it product to (Dartey-Baah, 2013). The company’s ability to adopt cultural dimensions and incorporating them in the management approaches has led to the creation of the seamless unity between the cultural diversity and the superior economic performance (Hofstede, 2011). The company has been able to distribute the power that the people have when undertaking the operations at the company such that it has led to the creation of the best relationship with the people. This approach has been instrumental in the reduction of the power distance and abolishment of the feeling that the company is imposing itself on the people (Dartey-Baah, 2013).
Dartey-Baah, K. (2013). The Cultural Approach to the Management of the International Human Resource: An Analysis of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions. International Journal Of Business Administration, 4 (2).
Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings In Psychology And Culture, 2 (1), p. 8.
Hofstede, G. (2002). The pitfalls of cross-national survey research: a reply to the article by Spector et al. on the psychometric properties of the Hofstede values survey module 1994. Applied Psychology, 51 (1), pp. 170--173.
Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture's consequences. Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage Publications.